Show & Tell

Today, we have Bill Schelly's obituary for Nick Cardy, the artist perhaps best known for his work on Aquaman and Bat Lash. Here's a sample:

Probably Cardy’s most critically lauded work was for the Bat Lash series from DC, launched in Showcase #76 (August 1968) and Bat Lash #1 (November 1968). The unorthodox Western series was conceived by editorial director Carmine Infantino, editor Joe Orlando, former editor Sheldon Mayer, and cartoonist Sergio Aragonés. The protagonist of the tongue-in-cheek series was a self-professed pacifist, ladies’ man, and gambler, so Cardy adopted a looser visual style to better accommodate the pronounced humorous elements in the book. (Some have compared it to the James Garner episodes of the TV series Maverick.) The stories, dialogued after the first issue by Denny O’Neil, were engaging, and immeasurably enhanced by Cardy’s inventive story-telling techniques (experimenting with the way the pictures flowed from panel to panel) and expressive inking. Produced when Cardy was 48 years old, Bat Lash benefited by work by an artist with decades of experience, who was also able to bring a remarkably youthful spirit to the pages. It represented a creative peak, and cemented Cardy’s position as an important interpreter of the sequential art form.

We also have the most recent column from Rob Steibel (not long after the comments-thread war from his last column finally died). This time, he looks at documents uncovered by Sean Howe, the author of Marvel Comics: The Untold Story.

Throughout the entire letter notice Lee emphasizes the fact that they are all under crushing deadline pressure. I think that’s true and I’m sure it was hard work, but I bet making comics sure beat working in a coal mine. Joe Sinnott was actually a real coal miner at one point in his life.


—Kickstarter & Criticsm. Probably the first thing worth noting today is the Kickstarter fund-raising event announced by Fantagraphics in order to support its 2014 spring season. As of this writing, the effort has reached nearly half of its $150,000 goal. Gary Groth explained the decision in more detail to Kiel Phegley at Comic Book Resources.

Since this site is published by Fantagraphics, I don't know that any further comment is appropriate here (other than to say that some of those rewards are pretty amazing), but I have noticed a few commenters here and there online either amusedly or angrily referencing my co-editor Dan's famous blog rant from a year or so back regarding the Retrofit Kickstarter for Secret Prison 7. (Phegley asks Groth about it, too.) I have two things to say about that: 1) It's important to note that there's nothing monolithic about The Comics Journal. Gary is fairly hands-off regarding the day-to-day operations of, and except when we ask for his opinion or advice (or on special occasions such as our tributes to Kim Thompson earlier this year), Gary is rarely directly involved with the articles and reviews we publish on the site. He undoubtedly disagrees with and/or rolls his eyes at multiple things we publish every month. For that matter, I do too. In my mind, TCJ is ideally a place where questions about comics as an art form and a business are debated, not answered definitively. The point is that readers shouldn't assume that any particular point made on the site by one writer is something agreed to by other writers and editors here; it just as likely isn't. 2) People forget that there were multiple angles to Dan's anti-SP7 rant. Some of it was about using Kickstarter, but the more cogent part of his argument (as I wrote at the time) regarded their announcement's slapdash appeal to poorly explained and misunderstood manga history. When the book finally came out, it was clear that Dan had hit the right nerve, because the editors made an obvious effort to strengthen the historical foundations of their argument, which in turn strengthened the book as a whole. The uproar from Dan's post also seemed to lead directly to increased donations to Retrofit's fundraiser. So in the end, the outcome of the exchange was elevated publicity and funding and a more solid final editorial product. Criticism should always be so productive.

This is one reason why I am not too dismayed by the multiple articles and flame wars appearing online this week attacking this site and its writers over Sean T. Collins and Frank Santoro's discussion about comics criticism. (For those curious, two of the most noteworthy come from Ng Suat Tong here and Heidi MacDonald here.) It is important to recognize what we are doing wrong (and hear what readers perceive as us doing wrong) in order for us to improve, and to the extent that the critiques are legitimate they can only guide us in our our attempts to do so. (I do wish that more effort was taken by critics to accurately assign responsibility for arguments and decisions—just as Gary might not agree with any given argument made on, Dan and I have nothing to do with editing the print version of TCJ, and Frank and Sean have even less—but that's a minor issue.)

—News. Diane Nelson takes to the Wall Street Journal to explain the reasoning behind DC's move to California. Publishers Weekly profiles the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund. Bleeding Cool reports on a baffling Apple decision. At Print, Michael Dooley talks to a cartoonist in a trademark dispute with Starbucks. Believed Behavior, an intriguing looking new art-comics subscription service has been launched.

—Interviews. On Too Much Information, Benjamen Walker will get you psyched up for this weekend's CAB show in Brooklyn (the Gabe Fowler-run successor to BCGF), interviewing Fowler, Art Spiegelman, and Peter Bagge. Memoirist and star Twitter-er Rob Delaney explains his admiration for Phoebe Gloeckner. D&Q creative director Tom Devlin shares some of his favorite books. Frank Santoro talks to Chris Mautner at Robot 6. Tell Me Something I Don't Know features Farel Dalrymple as a guest.

—Reviews & Comment. Chip McGrath explains Joe Sacco's The Great War. The New York Times compares online comics reading services. Jared Gardner reviews Dash Shaw's New School. (People coming to New York for CAB might want to visit the show at Adam Baumgold which is featuring Dash Shaw among many other artists, by the way. Art Spiegelman also has an exhibit up at the Jewish Museum, which is previewed here at the Times. And Charles Burns is being shown at Desert Island.) The Guardian reviews Isabel Greenberg's Encyclopedia of Early Earth. Janean Patience revisits Matt Wagner's Grendel. Finally, this Huffington Post best comics of the year list is weeurd.

12 Responses to Show & Tell

  1. patrick ford says:

    I went and looked at the Kickstarter site and saw there was a guy who published a sort of stick-figure comic and his goal was something like $50,000. He raised over a million dollars.

  2. Rob Barrett says:

    Order of the Stick is actually a very good long-format webcomic. Yes, Rich Burlew is drawing stick figures, but he manages to get an enormous amount of expression out of those figures.

  3. Lightning Lord says:

    Order of the Stick is actually terrible. It tells a horrible story that started out as parody that Burlew now expects us to take seriously, usually delivered in giant walls of text with no dynamism at all in the art. If you think that Chris Claremont’s “tell not show” tendencies are bad, well prepare yourself, because Burlew is the new master. Also, it’s drawn poorly (“it’s about stick figures” is no excuse) with eye searing coloring, and Burlew actually uses Comic Sans to letter the thing.

    I say this all as a huge D&D player, by the way.

  4. Ian Harker says:

    I think some of what Tim wrote is accurate about SP7 to be fair. While we were already boning up on our alt-manga history, as well as consulting with numerous english language scholars on the topic, the extra attention helped attract more interest from that community. Most notably the somewhat chance meetup we had with Ryan Holmberg which ultimately lead to his including this article in the book (

    As far as lighting a fire under our butts goes, there wasn’t too much we changed about the book following the rant. The book was printed about a month or so after that hit so it was mostly a completed project. I definitely took it to heart in the sense that I doubled up on my studies prior to meeting with Holmberg (re-reading his columns, book, etc.)

    The controversy surrounding the kickstarter probably lead to about $2000-$3000 in pledges, which ended up being the surplus money we used to pay a page-rate. So everybody won in that regard.

    I think the book was a success. There aren’t many copies left (last few available at CAB), everyone got paid, everyone got sizable stack of comp copies and the book accomplished what we wanted it to, to get people to think about the artists involved in context to alt-manga. I’ve had numerous young artists come up this year and tell me that it was the perfect book for them, so that’s nice.

  5. Hey Tim, I’ve been very clear—or hope I have been anyway—in my criticisms that they are only about the print version of the Journal. I think the online has been very diverse and forward looking.

  6. Tim Hodler says:

    Thanks for the comment, Heidi. I probably wasn’t clear enough myself. I wasn’t referring to your post on its own so much as to the whole gamut of recent-ish reaction: people blaming Gary for starting a Kickstarter after Dan’s column (as though he should be bound by a hastily written blog post Dan made in a bad mood), people blaming Sean and Frank for the number of female writers on the site, though that is my and Dan’s responsibility, not theirs, various people in your (and our) comments threads, Twitter arguments, etc. I’ve noticed that everyone involved with the Journal tends to get conflated into one hive-mind entity hated by multiple people for contradictory sins, sometimes committed decades ago, and sometimes never committed at all by anyone outside of the haters’ imaginations. Often, the attacks don’t even make sense: We are attacked for being elitist hipster snobs who ignore the mainstream in the same breath that we are derided for being genre revisionists indulging in nostalgic love for superhero comics. It’s all part of the game, of course, and proves that people care about what the Journal stands for, but sometimes I just wish the critics more accurately aimed their bile. Legitimate criticism on the other hand is welcome, even if it hurts (that’s when I know it may be legit).

  7. Tim Hodler says:

    A day later I have to say I feel a little silly. Because of all the recent fracas, I expected the Kickstarter to prompt a lot more unfair criticism directed at Fantagraphics than it has; the discussion of it I’ve seen so far has actually proved mostly judicious and thoughtful, including from those against it. Maybe people are less petty than I thought. (Or maybe I’ll feel silly about this comment tomorrow…)

  8. Scott Grammel says:

    To the degree that people are contributing to the Kickstarter campaign to get specific goodies (signed or sketched books, limited edition shirts or prints, etc.), there’s a degree of reasonableness to the entire enterprise. And, of course, there are always lots of people with lots more money than I have willing to part with some for what they might consider a good cause.

    But starting the appeal off with the loss of Kim Thompson and thus his slate of European books does make me wonder if there isn’t some individual or individuals somewhere who could be hired to translate and edit them. As, I’d think, a first, and not a last, step.

    And, of course, every time Fantagraphics has a sale, I buy more books from them. So I’d like to see that, too. That’s when I get my checkbook out.

  9. patrick ford says:

    The Kickstarter is off to a good start. The company might want to tweak the offerings because many (if not most) of the more desirable and affordable offerings (basically signed copies of the books) are already sold out. Books signed by Clowes, The brothers Hernandez, Woodring, Sacco, Bagge, Millionaire, etc. sold out almost immediately.

  10. patrick ford says: has a bunch of the great interviews with women cartoonists which saw print in the magazine.
    Here’s one which has some additional thoughts added to it which are exclusive to the web site. It’s interesting to see no one commented on it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *