A Modest Proposal: More Crap Is What We Need

Every few weeks I receive a batch of mediocre graphic albums from France. So-so humor, dull detective stories, fatuous heroic fantasy, cruddy crime stories - stuff that if I had nothing better to do I might read, but wouldn't actually buy.

Basically, it's crap. And my understanding is that aside from a handful of superstar series likeAsterix and Blueberry and such, it's the crap that keeps the French comics industry alive.

What's interesting about French crap is that it's all technically pretty good, and works within the trappings of genre fiction that would be accessible to the average reader. It's the equivalent of the kind of fat paperbacks you can buy at the airport.

What's also interesting is that the crappy French genre work covers a relatively broad spectrum of quality, so that by the time you get to the top you've got a few genuinely outstanding detective series, some first-rate science fiction, a few great Westerns, and so forth. Very little of it's actually unreadably bad, or incomprehensible, or grotesquely ingrown. Unlike in the U.S., some of the very top French cartoonists either make a career in genre fiction, or dabble in it. (Jacques Tardi is arguably the greatest cartoonist of his generation, and at least half a dozen of his major works are flat-out detective novels.)

One of the big European successes of the '90s was XIII, a fairly preposterous but compelling paranoid thriller series that was the equivalent of a Bruce Willis or Mel Gibson movie (or TV maxi-series). Well (if somewhat coldly) drawn by the journeyman William Vance, and written by the prolific Jean Van Hamme - people my esteemed co-publisher would immediately dub "hacks," I'm sure - it was good enough for me to regret when my supply of free new volumes ran out due to a changing of the guard at the publisher. (Catalan published a couple of the volumes as part of their "Comcat" swan song, to general indifference.)


Similarly, Hermann's "Jeremiah" series, which Fantagraphics published in the U.S. as The Survivors over a decade ago, continues apace with a new album every year - it doesn't have much on its mind except post-apocalypse Road Warrior-type mayhem, but it's beautifully drawn and insidiously addicting. I buy a couple every time I hit Paris, then hide them in shame.

What I see as missing from American comics is that bulwark of solid, unpretentious, accessible genre fiction - a more or less undistinguished mass of okay-to-good comics that might catch your eye and give you a thrill, that loyal fans would buy out of habit, and anyone else might just pick up for the hell of it.

We don't have that in the U.S. What we have is Art Comics on one end and Unimaginably Awful Super-Hero Shit on the other. The handful of cartoonists who try to explore some middle ground of decent genre fiction are few and far between, and are usually ignored by the super-hero fans and scorned by the "alternative" fans (unless it was done in the 1950s, in which case they've acquired that patina of coolness). I don't like "Sin City" particularly, but I have a suspicion that a lot of people who hate it would hate it even if it was done with the skill, wit, and verve of the great SpanishTorpedo series - and a lot of the people who love it love it because it's Frank Miller, and would ignore a much better series done by Joe Blow.

My conviction is that an Art medium works only so long as it is supported by a populist Crap medium. Reading, or going to the theatre, or going to the movies, is a habit, and it's not a habit that imposes itself on the more exalted end of the spectrum.

I'm not arguing that publishers have to do crap to support the unprofitable good stuff. (That's probably true, but it's not what I'm specifically arguing here.) I'm arguing that in what is a pop medium, like it or not, you need the "pop" part to sustain it.

Comics need Dean Koontzes and Robert Ludlums and Leon Urises and that Clear-and-Present-Danger guy, Tom what's-his-name. They need stuff that's kind of dumb but also a little bit smart, not particularly adult but not totally juvenile. They need a middle ground somewhere between Utter Shit and Great Art. Otherwise the marginalization will continue, and the genre stuff will turn into modern network TV (i.e. horrible beyond belief) and the good stuff will turn into modern poetry, and we'll all be fucked.

I think this is to some degree what Alan Moore is trying to do with his America's Best Comics line (even though it's heavily weighted towards super-hero comics, which is something of a problem in the grand scheme of things). I think it's what was on Art Spiegelman's mind when he co-created the Neon Lit line, but whoops! they ended up being more (no pun intended) Art comics. There are blips and blinks and spurts of it, from the good (Usagi Yojimbo) to the bad (Ms. Tree) to the forgotten (those DC sci-fi titles of the '80s). But until the day comes when there's enough of this kind of basic, unglamorous genre material that Joe Public could walk into a bookstore and buy a comic for beach reading, just because he felt like turning off his brain, comics will likely continue to be marginal and ignored. And I suspect we'll just have to live with that.



12 Responses to A Modest Proposal: More Crap Is What We Need

  1. Allen Smith says:

    Kim’s commentary is truer than ever here in 2011. And the popularity of the comics continues to slide.

  2. progart says:

    I’ve noticed the date of this article halve-way through my reading. Much has changed and still remains the same.

  3. Joshua says:

    I am so glad I’m not the only one who thinks this. Every art form has it’s great, mediocre, and bad. It is that middle ground that pays the bills. It appeals to the average person. It’s not too smart for them, and they don’t feel cheated by a lack of quality.

  4. Alec Trench says:

    I suppose this is what I consider a lot of “graphic memoirs” to be: well made, without being “art-school” and entertaining, without being condescending.

    They certainly seem to be the prominent products, as well. People I know who aren’t that into comics will happily recommend graphic novels to each other that are autobiographical, especially if there is some tragedy or injustice (preferably followed by redemption in some quarter) involved in the plot.

    I’m not trying to say that all auto-bio comics are mediocre, and I don’t dismiss them off-hand (unless they’re about coming-of-age) but the ones that are popular outside of comics-hip circles do seem formally bland; unchallenging, content-wise; and very much in key with afternoon radio-dramas or the way I imagine most bestselling novels to be. Especially the novels with white covers that are about sad lives and the struggle to move on.

    Based on a True Story!! This Really Happened!! It’s always been an effective lure for the hesitant reader.

  5. Alec Trench says:

    Also, anything that’s coloured the way current manstream comics are is an embarrassment to hold in your hands.

    Stories that use very few, fairly muted spot-colours are instantly more reassuringly mature seeming. (Again, I’m speaking on behalf of the notional non-comics-obsessed casual reader.)

    Too many hues and too much heavy modelling just creates a look that only belongs in the bedrooms of 14 year old boys.

  6. Pingback: Carnival of souls: Special “San Diego Days 4&5″ edition « Attentiondeficitdisorderly by Sean T. Collins

  7. Roger Benson says:

    Comics needs more Steven Soderberghs.

  8. Scott Grammel says:

    Only if they all take early retirement, too.

  9. Tozo says:

    This is exactly how I describe it to people, but then you have to deal with the “comics aren’t movies, boo!” routine.

    The problem is that trying to be a Soderbergh of comics, and this “middle” way in general, requires very wide set of skills and an incredible proeficiency in all of them. So it kinda takes more work to produce less visible comics, in a way.

  10. Pingback: Comics Alternative Podcast

  11. Tyler says:

    This is the role Image has been playing lately. With comics like Saga, Chew, and The Walking Dead they are creating good comics that are addictive and accessible to non-comics readers.

  12. Tim Weinmann says:

    RE: Tyler
    I was just going to say that too. It’s two years later, and now Image even has books about, like, wrestlers and cowboys and shit. There’s almost a grindhouse scene emerging where the 2nd tier companies are interrupting their obnoxious licensing of nostalgic garbage to produce some pretty entertaining genre drivel. I’m thinking of Snow Blind (crime genre) and Venus (sci-fi) from Boom, and Harrow County (horror) and 9th Wave (crime capers for Mother Earth) from Dark Horse (just a few examples). Also, Vertigo has Sheriff of Babylon (crime in a war zone) and Beto and Cooke’s Twilight Children (sci-fi, but artsy). Non-super genre stuff occupies a decent and growing chunk of my retailer’s wall-space.

    Bummer is, “art comics” still occupy 0%. If only some company would go back to producing a few of em….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *